The stages of an effective meeting include studying a problem, generating alternatives, evaluating alternatives and making and considering the outcome of decisions.
Each stage of a meeting has specific goals to achieve. The chairperson and members should have these objectives in mind throughout the meeting.
The following are the functional stages of an effective meeting:
Effective Meeting: Studying a Specific Problem
Studying a specific problem involves looking at the problem from different points of view
The first step is to define the problem: What is it? What are the far reaching effects of the problem on the organizations.
Analyze the data available and see what the group can learn from it.
Look at the problem using intuition: let the gut feeling prevail.
Look at the negative aspects of the problem. Will it work? If not, why?
Now look at the problem in a positive light: what are the benefits? How can it be used to benefit the organization?
Are there better ways to deal with the problem?
The chairperson should control the whole problem analysis exercise by alternating between different points of view as described above.
Brainstorm the members for solutions. Tell the members to come out with asolution that comes into their minds. No discussions, no criticisms. The secretary should tabulate the ideas on a white board.
Effective Meeting Solutions: Evaluating the Alternatives
Once the ideas from members are recorded, analyze the pros and cons for each.
Make a list of ideas that could be considered.
Can these be improvised or bettered?
Effective Meeting: Making Decisions and Considering the Outcome
Select the best solutions offered by the members.
How to best adapt these to suit the organization’s needs.
What could be the outcome of the actions planned?
Helpful Hints for a Successful Meeting
Prepared speeches should not be allowed in a decision making meeting. They may not match the mood, they cannot take into account speeches made earlier, they may repeat points already made and fail to reply to points already made.
Visual aids should be used as aids only, not as propaganda. All visual aids need be updated. It is unnerving to see out of date facts and figures projected and explained.
All participants should realize that they are supposed to contribute something creative to the meeting; otherwise they will not be there in the first place!
All members should arrive in time. It is discourteous to other members not to do so. Remember everyone’s time is precious.
There should be no private discussions during the meeting. If anything is not understood, raise your hand and ask for clarification.
Participants should abide by majority decisions and cooperate to carry out the decisions.
Chairperson should break the ice by asking each member (in a small group) to provide his overview of the problem, taking a minute each.
If grouping is required to form an action team, select members at random; the risk of getting inactive persons in the same group is remote.
After every 90 minutes productivity starts to fade; give a break.
Like the start of the meeting, ending time should also be as planned.
After the meeting, action has to be initiated to produce the minutes and reports of the meeting; pay bill and the speaker; prepare a report to any sponsors and send letters of appreciation.
The copyright of the article Stages of an Effective Meeting in Non-Profit Governance is owned by Hanish Babu. Permission to republish Stages of an Effective Meeting in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.
Great article, thank you. I'd like to suggest using "chair"
or "chairperson" instead of the word chairman. The 'man' is often
a woman, so a more inclusive word is more accurate, I think. Thanks
again!
Mar 20, 2009 2:02 PM
Hanish Babu :
Thanks, for the suggestion. I had indeed thought about using the word
chair(inanimate object?)or chairperson (no personality like the word
chairman?), decided against it; as recently even female chairpersons prefer
the designation "chairman" to others.
The definition
of chairman is " the person who chairs the meeting". The 'man'
here does not indicate the masculine gender. Hence the latest trend is to
use the term "chairman" to chairperson and chair.
After all, we only use the term "manning the chair" not
"womaning the chair" or "personing the chair"; does it
not sound odd? There is no chauvenism in it; only the rationalistic use of
language.